October 6, 2025

Care Nex

Stay Healthy, Live Happy

The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 20, the hidden cost of intraocular lens choices for National Health Service funded cataract surgery in England

The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 20, the hidden cost of intraocular lens choices for National Health Service funded cataract surgery in England
  • Donachie PHJ, Barnes B, Olaitan M, Buchan JC. National Ophthalmology Database Audit: seventh annual report of the National Cataract Audit. (2024).

  • Lansingh VC, Carter MJ, Martens M. Global cost-effectiveness of cataract surgery. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:1670–8.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Health and the Public Interest. Out of Sight—Understanding the Hidden Impact of Cataract Outsourcing on NHS Finances. (2024).

  • Buchan JC, Norman P, Shickle D, Cassels-Brown A, MacEwen C. Failing to plan and planning to fail. Can we predict the future growth of demand on UK Eye Care Services?. Eye. 2019;33:1029–31.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Ophthalmology Alliance. How to choose an intraocular lens (IOL) in an NHS eye unit. (2018).

  • Ting DSJ, Tatham AJ, Donachie PHJ, Buchan JC. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: report 16, influence of remuneration model on choice of intraocular lens in the UK. Eye. 2023;37:3854–60.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Donachie PHJ, Barnes BL, Olaitan M, Sparrow JM, Buchan JC. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ National Ophthalmology Database study of cataract surgery: Report 9, risk factors for posterior capsule opacification. Eye. 2022;37:1633–9.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y, Yang K, Li J, Huang Y, Zhu S. Comparison of hydrophobic and hydrophilic intraocular lens in preventing posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery: an updated meta-analysis. Medicine. 2017;96:e8301.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokko HA, et al. Factors associated with the development of posterior capsule opacification requiring yttrium aluminum garnet capsulotomy. Optom Vis Sci. 2019;96:492–9.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekemiri K, et al. Global burden of fall and associated factors among individual with low vision: a systematic-review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2024;19:e0302428.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu S, et al. Social engagement and cognitive impairment among nursing home residents: the role of sensory impairment. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2024;122:105397.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen H, et al. Associations between vision impairment and vision-related interventions on crash risk and driving cessation: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2023;13:e065210.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullin F, Busch T, Lundström M. Economic considerations related to choice of intraocular lens (IOL) and posterior capsule opacification frequency—a comparison of three different IOLs. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;92:179–83.

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossack N, et al. German claims data analysis to assess impact of different intraocular lenses on posterior capsule opacification and related healthcare costs. J Public Health. 2018;26:81–90.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Raulinajtys-Grzybek M, Grabska-Liberek I, Opala A, Słomka M, Chrobot M. Budget impact analysis of lens material on the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) as a complication after the cataract surgery. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020;18:19.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE guideline [NG77—cataracts in adults: management. (2017).

  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. NICE process and methods [PMG36]—NICE health technology evaluations: the manual. (2022).

  • Office for National Statistics. Life tables, principal projection, UK (2022-based edition of this dataset). https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/datasets/lifetablesprincipalprojectionunitedkingdom.

  • NHS England. 2023/25 NHS Payment Scheme: 2024/25 prices workbook. (2023).

  • Georgiou A, Ruston J, Haque S, Woollard A. Accuracy and remunerative implications of clinical coding in elective plastic surgery. Bulletin. 2022;104:190–4.

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council, NHS Health Research Authority. Do I need NHS REC review? (2020).

  • Fight for Sight. Time to Focus. (2020).

  • Auffarth G, LaHood B. Letter to the editor—hydrophilic acrylic IOLs. EuroTimes. 2023;28:5. https://www.escrs.org/eurotimes-articles/hydrophilic-acrylic-iols/.

  • Grzybowski A, Zemaitiene R, Markeviciute A, Tuuminen R. Should we abandon hydrophilic intraocular lenses?. Am J Ophthalmol. 2022;237:139–45.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanavaty MA. Hydrophobic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses within public sector based on the type of funding contacts: the debate continues. Eye. 2023;37:3712–3.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brézin AP, et al. Incidence of Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy following cataract surgery: a population-based nation-wide study—FreYAG1 study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2023;23:417.

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.